healthreviewsergonomics

Are Custom Insoles and Custom Mats Worth the Hype? A Skeptical Look at Placebo Tech in Footwear and Flooring

mmatforyou

2026-01-24

9 min read

A skeptical, evidence-first guide to whether custom insoles and anti-fatigue mats deliver real benefits or are just placebo tech.

Are custom insoles and custom mats worth the hype? A skeptical, evidence-first look

Hook: You’re tired of sore feet after a long day, worried about buying the wrong mat for your standing desk, or curious whether that 3D-scanned insole actually does anything beyond making you feel fancy. You want solutions that solve real problems—durable, safe, and backed by evidence—not glossy marketing. Let’s cut through the hype.

The context: why this debate matters in 2026

In late 2025 and early 2026 the direct-to-consumer (DTC) wellness boom accelerated: companies selling custom insoles via smartphone 3D scanning, subscription orthotics, and bespoke foot support mats for workshops and standing desks turned commonplace. That boom coincided with a skeptical piece in The Verge (Jan 16, 2026) calling one 3D-scanned insole “another example of placebo tech.” The article struck a nerve because consumers are paying premium prices for promises that aren’t always proven.

“This is 3D-scanned insole as placebo tech,” — Victoria Song, The Verge, Jan 16, 2026

That critique forces a useful question: when does customization matter for feet and floors—and when is it marketing wrapped in novelty?

Quick answer up front (inverted pyramid):

Some custom solutions are worth it. For medically complex feet (diabetic neuropathy, major structural deformity), workers on long shifts, or athletes with asymmetry, custom insoles and mats can produce measurable benefits.
Much customization is marginal. For most healthy people, high-quality off‑the‑shelf insoles and well-designed anti‑fatigue mats deliver similar short‑term comfort at a fraction of the cost.
Placebo matters. Perceived comfort often drives satisfaction—expectations and fit can make you feel better even if measurable biomechanics don’t change much.

What The Verge critique actually shows (and what it doesn’t)

The Verge’s hands‑on review highlighted several problems with many DTC scanned insoles: rapid adoption of tech without clinical validation, overpromising marketing, and a focus on customization as an emotional sell. That’s an important callout, but it’s not the whole story.

Why the critique resonates:

Many companies use smartphone scans or quick foot molds without publishing controlled trials.
Placebo and novelty—getting something “made for you”—can drive perceived benefit even when objective measures are unchanged.
Pricing and warranty structures sometimes don’t match the clinical value offered.

What it doesn't prove:

That every custom insole or mat is worthless. Clinical orthotics made by podiatrists for neuropathy or severe deformity have decades of evidence in specific contexts.
That technology can’t improve outcomes—only that proof matters.

Evidence snapshot: what research says about insoles and anti-fatigue mats

Custom insoles and orthotics

Research is mixed and highly context-dependent:

Randomized trials often show modest improvements for conditions like plantar fasciitis, patellofemoral pain, and overuse injuries, but effect sizes vary and can be short‑lived.
For populations at high risk—people with diabetic foot ulcers, severe deformities, or major gait asymmetries—custom therapeutic footwear and insoles can prevent ulcers and reduce pressure points, and are supported by clinical guidelines when prescribed by a clinician.
For the average consumer seeking general comfort, many studies find off‑the‑shelf cushioning, supportive lasts, and proper shoe fit offer similar short‑term pain reduction to custom devices.

Anti‑fatigue mats (flooring and workplace use)

Anti‑fatigue mats are designed to reduce discomfort from prolonged standing by encouraging subtle muscle movement and distributing pressure. The evidence shows:

Short-term reductions in perceived fatigue and lower-limb discomfort are consistently reported across lab and field studies.
Long-term injury prevention evidence is weaker and inconsistent—mats help comfort but aren’t proven to eliminate musculoskeletal disorders on their own.
Mat design matters: thickness, resiliency (durometer), beveled edges, and surface texture affect effectiveness and safety (trip risk, slip resistance).

Bottom line: anti‑fatigue mats provide clear anti-fatigue mat benefits for perceived comfort and short‑term productivity, but their capacity to prevent chronic injury is limited without broader ergonomic interventions.

Why placebo tech exists—and why that’s not always bad

The term placebo tech captures products that primarily rely on psychological effects—novelty, personalization, or ritual—to create perceived benefit. There are three mechanisms at work:

Expectation: If you believe a product is tailored to you, you focus on the benefits and report better outcomes.
Fit and immediate comfort: Even small shape changes that improve shoe fit can reduce hotspots and friction—real, tangible benefits that may not show up on some biomechanical tests.
Behavioral change: Buying a new insole or mat often triggers other beneficial behaviors: better footwear hygiene, seeking medical advice, or using the mat consistently at work.

Placebo effects are real, often durable, and ethically acceptable when the product genuinely improves quality of life. The problem is when companies lean solely on placebo language while claiming medically proven outcomes they can’t demonstrate.

When custom is actually necessary: expert, evidence‑based criteria

Don’t buy custom out of FOMO. Here are clear, experience-driven signals that customization is likely to help:

Medical indication: Diabetes with neuropathy or prior foot ulceration; prescription from a podiatrist, orthopedist, or physical therapist recommending custom therapeutic insoles.
Structural deformity: Severe pronation/supination, bunions, Charcot foot, or long-standing leg-length discrepancy that alters gait mechanics significantly.
Failed off-the-shelf solutions: You’ve tried multiple industry-standard mass-market insoles and comfort shoes for several months without relief.
High occupational demand: Workers who stand/walk >6–8 hours daily on hard surfaces (manufacturing, food service) where tailored cushioning, beveled edges, anti‑slip backing, and oil-resistant materials can meaningfully reduce risk and discomfort.
Elite athletic needs: Competitive athletes with asymmetric biomechanics or recurring injuries that performance orthoses might measurably improve.

When custom is unlikely to be worth the price

Casual users seeking general comfort for walking 30–60 minutes daily.
People whose primary problem is poor shoe fit—often resolved by a different shoe size or style, not an expensive custom insole.
When a company can’t show any validation, trials, or a credible clinical pathway for complex cases.

Practical buyer’s checklist: how to evaluate custom insoles and mats (be skeptical, but fair)

Before you spend a premium, use this checklist.

Clinical validation and transparency

Ask for published studies, randomized controlled trials, or at least independent lab data on pressure mapping, durometer testing, and slip resistance.
Does the company show pre/post pressure maps or gait analyses with objective measures? Are these peer‑reviewed or third‑party validated?

Scan method & prescription process

3D scanning: Can be useful for shape capture. But ask what the scan informs—material selection? Build angle? Or is it a cosmetic garnish?
Dynamic assessment: The gold standard for many issues includes gait analysis and clinician oversight, not just a static foot scan.
Customization depth: Is the product algorithmically generated only, or does a clinician review and adjust the prescription?

Materials & build quality

Preferred materials for durability and support: multi‑density EVA, medical‑grade polyurethane, cork for stability, natural rubber for anti-slip mats.
Thickness and durometer should match the use case: thin, firm for stability; thicker and more resilient for anti‑fatigue cushioning.

Trial, return policy & warranty

Insist on a 30–90 day trial or a clinical refund policy. Custom products should still have a reasonable return path if they don’t help — see examples of platform-level return practices in product reviews like the GlamShare review.
Check warranty on delamination and compression loss—these are common failure modes.

Safety and compliance for mats

Look for slip resistance ratings (ASTM or equivalent), beveled edges to reduce trip hazard, and oil/chemical resistance for kitchens or shops.
Check anti-microbial coatings if hygiene is a priority, but verify longevity claims.

How to test a custom product effectively (practical steps)

Start with a baseline: photograph wear patterns on old shoes, note daily standing/walking time and pain scale (0–10).
Use the product for at least 2–6 weeks under normal conditions—many benefits accrue slowly as tissues adapt.
Document perceived comfort and objective signs (reduced hotspots, less redness, fewer blisters). If available, request before/after pressure mapping.
If condition worsens, stop and consult a clinician—there should be a clear escalation pathway for adverse effects.

Case studies (realistic composites to show nuance)

Case A: The barista with chronic lower-leg fatigue

Symptom: 8-hour shifts on concrete, calf soreness and swelling at week’s end. Tried foam mats and off-the-shelf insoles with modest relief.

Outcome: Employer-installed 0.5" resilient anti‑fatigue mats, beveled walkways, and a custom-inset mat behind the coffee station reduced perceived fatigue and shortened recovery time. The mat was chosen for workplace durability, oil resistance, and a 90-day trial. This is a success where workplace ergonomics + the right mat produced measurable gains.

Case B: Recreational runner with plantar fasciitis

Symptom: Chronic heel pain despite stretching and standard insoles.

Outcome: After gait analysis, clinician-ordered custom orthotics plus a targeted physio program reduced symptoms over months. The custom device was necessary because of an unusual foot posture and persistent symptoms—this is where evidence supports prescription orthoses.

2026 trends and what to expect next

Better validation and regulation: After high-profile critiques in 2025–2026, expect more startups to publish validation data and for third‑party testing to become a market differentiator.
AI-driven personalization: Improved pressure‑map aggregation and machine learning will refine prescriptions, but success depends on quality data and clinician oversight—not just nicer apps. Read more on on-device and AI personalization patterns.
Integrated sensor mats/insoles: Low-cost pressure sensors embedded in mats and insoles will allow real-time feedback, enabling objective measures of efficacy—but privacy and durability will be concerns.
Sustainability demand: Eco-friendly materials (recycled rubber, bio‑based foams) will gain market share among conscious buyers in 2026, but performance testing is essential. See examples in sustainable product positioning research like the sustainability playbooks.

Actionable takeaways: what you should do next

If you have a medical concern (diabetes, severe pain), prioritize clinician-prescribed custom orthotics over DTC novelty.
If you’re buying for comfort at a standing desk, invest in a high-quality anti‑fatigue mat with the right thickness and slip rating before paying for bespoke solutions.
Look for companies that publish validation data, offer trials, and have clinician involvement—these separate credible tech from placebo marketing.
Track outcomes: document your pain and function before purchase and after 4–8 weeks. That’s how you tell placebo from real benefit.

Final verdict: measured skepticism wins

Customization in footwear and flooring is not inherently bad, but the field is noisy. In 2026, the smart buyer blends healthy skepticism with evidence-based criteria:

Use custom products when clinical need, occupational demand, or failed conservative care justify the cost.
For many people, well-chosen off‑the‑shelf insoles and a thoughtfully selected anti‑fatigue mat deliver most of the everyday value.
Demand transparency, trials, and clinical oversight. Placebo effects can be helpful—but don’t accept marketing claims in place of results.

Want help choosing the right mat or insole?

At matforyou.com we test anti‑fatigue mats and insoles across real-world conditions—durability, slip resistance, pressure mapping, and long-term compression loss. Use our free sizing guide and evidence filters to compare options side-by-side, or submit your workplace or foot profile for a prioritized recommendation.

Call to action: Try our 60‑day trial guide for custom and off‑the‑shelf insoles, and download the 2026 anti‑fatigue mat checklist. Make a confident, evidence‑based choice—no placebo required.

matforyou

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Up Next

Mat Personalization & Microfactories: Scaling Custom Mats with Edge AI and Micro‑Fulfillment in 2026

Health•6 min read

Innovative Ways to Care for Your Anti-Fatigue Mats

events•8 min read

Local Hosts & Events: Choosing the Right Mats for Community Pop‑Ups and Night Markets (2026)

2026-01-25T04:25:30.022Z